Define the scope
Record the pages, screens, documents, and states you will review. Include instructions, errors, confirmations, and any third-party steps in the task.
PRACTICAL ACCESSIBILITY TESTING
Plan an accessibility review, document useful findings, and verify changes with a repeatable workflow.
PLAN THE REVIEW
Choose something people need to accomplish, such as completing an enquiry or finding information in a document. These starting points help uncover barriers; they are not a complete accessibility audit.
Record the pages, screens, documents, and states you will review. Include instructions, errors, confirmations, and any third-party steps in the task.
Use automated checks alongside keyboard review and other manual checks. Include assistive technologies relevant to the experience, and involve people with disabilities to understand how barriers affect real tasks.
Record the browser, device, software versions, and settings used. Note what you tested and what remains outside the review so others can understand the limits of the results.
No single tool can determine whether an experience is accessible. Human evaluation is needed, and a short set of checks can miss significant barriers.
Explore W3C WAI’s evaluation resources (opens in a new tab)MAKE FINDINGS ACTIONABLE
A useful finding connects an observed problem to its impact on a task. Include a clear location, repeatable steps, actual behaviour, and the expected result. Add supporting evidence and the relevant accessibility requirement when you have verified it.
This illustrative finding concerns a website’s main navigation. The menu opens with a mouse, but a person using a keyboard cannot reveal its links.
Record the exact page address and testing environment with the finding. A screenshot or short recording can support the explanation, but the written steps should stand on their own.
CHECK THE OUTCOME
A code change is ready for verification when you can repeat the original test. Check whether the barrier is resolved and whether the complete task now works.
Keep the original finding and add the retest date, environment, evidence, and outcome. If the issue remains, describe what still prevents completion.
For a first review, W3C WAI’s Easy Checks (opens in a new tab) offers practical prompts. It does not replace a comprehensive evaluation.
KEEP LEARNING
Build on this topic, browse all resources, or talk with us about your work.